Subregionalism, the Pacific Islands Forum, and Regional Security

Pacific subregionalism is exemplified by the establishment of three geocultural subregional groups within the design of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF). To examine the complex dynamics of Pacific subregionalism and its implications on regional security, this paper identifies three concepts—cultural ties, geoeconomics, and the perceived failure of regionalism—as significant factors leading to the formation of the Melanesian Spearhead Group, the Micronesian Presidents’ Summit, and the Polynesian Leaders Group. Understanding the interests of these subregional groups is critical to strengthening the position of the PIF as a regional bloc to address external strategic and geopolitical influences. A strong PIF means that the region has a secure negotiating bloc in global politics to address the region’s most pressing concern: climate change. Uniting these subgroups involves understanding the differences and diversity that exists within the values and interests that these groups represent. The PIF’s conciliatory process to addressing regional concerns is not always a guarantee. The stability within its membership involves these groups putting internal interests first before external ones. Therefore, a united front on regionalism and subregionalism acts as a catalyst for the successful implementation of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent—the Pacific’s newest pathway to achieve regional security.