Air & Space Operations Review

Enter Keyword:

About ASOR
Publication Ethics Statement
Submission Guidelines
Book Reviews
- Books Available for Review
- Online Book Reviews
Subscribe
Archives
- ASOR Journal Archives
- ASPJ Archives
International Editions Archives
- Africa and Francophonie
- Spanish
Contact Us
Please e-mail your comments, suggestions, or address change to
ASOR@au.af.edu.

The journal encourages thoughtful debate in the form of scholarly feedback to our articles. For publication consideration, reviews/commentaries on our articles must range between 1,000 and 2,000 words, be appropriately footnoted (narrative footnotes are not permitted), and upon acceptance, will be sent to the article author for an opportunity to respond to the critique. Once finalized, the resulting review and reply will be featured in an upcoming journal issue.

Letter from the Editor

An introduction letter written by the ASOR Lead Editor.

Strategic Missile Defense and Nuclear Arms Control: Aspirations and Achievable Goals
Stephen J. Cimbala and Adam Lowther
While a nationwide missile defense system seems to be a universal solution to protecting ballistic missiles, a deeper analysis concludes such a system has utility, but is not a panacea for defending against such an attack.

Disinformation and Entropy: Leveraging AI in the Information Environment
José R. Davis
Examining the impact of disinformation and potential AI-driven counter-technologies reveals opportunities for the Air Force to win in an age of AI.

An Integrated Space Test Lexicon: A Taxonomy for the Integrated Test and Evaluation of Space Systems
Stephen K. Tullino, Andrew S. Keys, Robert A. Bettinger, Amy M. Cox, and David R. Jacques
A proposed Integrated Space Test Lexicon is intended to amalgamate the numerous definitions of integrated test, developmental test, and operational test into unified service-wide definitions, aligned with the Space Test Enterprise Vision.

From Cars to People: Advancing Installation Design
Louis J. Zib III and Christopher M. Chini
The Air Force’s current base design maximizes passive protections against outmoded attacks; however, a modernized, people-centric base design will be more cost efficient and more effective at mitigating adversary attacks.

Combat Casualty Care: Engaging Allies and Partners in a DoD Global Trauma System
Mason H. Remondelli, Ryan M. Leone, Collin Todd, Natalia K. Barzanji, Jennifer M. Gurney, Teri Duquette-Frame, Jason B. Brill, and Derek J. Licina
Enhancing the US DoD combatant command trauma system by incorporating Ally and partner nations represents a critical opportunity for improving geostrategic alliances and building partner-nation capacity.